UK Manufacturing

The Five Step Meeting Cadence That Stops Your Team Going in Circles

Posted on by Adam Payne

You know the meeting. It happens every Monday at nine, or maybe it’s Friday afternoon when everyone’s just watching the clock until they can get to the car park. Someone opens with “right, where are we with the delivery issue on line two” and forty minutes later you’re still talking about the same delivery issue. Same names come up. Same excuses get an airing. Someone says they’ll “look into it” and everyone nods like that means something. Then next week, you open with almost the exact same sentence.

If that sounds familiar, you’re not alone. And to be honest, it’s not really your team’s fault. Most weekly meetings in manufacturing weren’t built with any real structure to begin with. They grew out of habit. Someone, years ago, decided Monday morning was a sensible time to get everyone in a room, and the agenda has more or less stayed the same ever since, drifting between updates, gripes and the odd bit of finger pointing.

Here’s the thing though. You already know a method that would sort this out. You probably use it on the shop floor most days without giving it a second thought. Plan, Do, Check, Act. PDCA is stitched into how most UK manufacturers run their quality checks, their changeovers, their continuous improvement work. Nobody ever thought to apply that same discipline to the one meeting that’s supposed to hold the whole week together.

This post walks you through a five step meeting cadence built on that PDCA rhythm. It isn’t theory dressed up as advice. It’s a structure you can lift and use this week, with a sample agenda, the questions worth asking at each stage, and some fairly blunt thoughts on getting actions to actually happen, rather than just getting written down and quietly forgotten.

Stick with me on this one. It sounds almost too obvious to need writing down, and maybe that’s exactly why so few teams actually do it properly.

Why your weekly meeting keeps going nowhere

Worth diagnosing this properly first, because if you jump straight to a new agenda template without understanding why meetings drift in the first place, you’ll be back here in six months wondering why nothing’s changed.

Most circular meetings share a few habits, and I’d guess at least two of these sound familiar.

There’s no shared starting point. Everyone walks in with their own version of how the week went. Production thinks it went fine. Quality has a different story. Nobody’s looked at the same numbers before the meeting starts, so the first fifteen minutes gets eaten up just agreeing on what actually happened, before anyone’s even touched what to do about it.

Then there’s the tendency to ask “who” instead of “why”. A machine goes down twice in a fortnight and the conversation turns into who was on shift rather than what actually failed and why it keeps failing. That’s a completely natural instinct, by the way. Nobody enjoys sitting with an uncomfortable root cause. Blame is quicker and it feels like progress even when it changes nothing at all.

Actions get assigned to “the team” rather than a person. You’ve heard it. “We need to look at that.” Who’s we? By the time next week rolls around, everyone quietly assumed someone else picked it up.

And maybe the biggest one. Nobody actually checks last week’s actions before diving into this week’s problems. So the list just grows. It never gets reviewed, never gets properly closed off, and the same issues resurface because the loop never actually closes. That’s the circle, really. It isn’t that your team lacks ideas or effort. It’s that the meeting has no mechanism for finishing what it starts.

There’s a quieter version of this too, one that doesn’t get talked about much. Meetings that run long because they’ve become the only place certain people feel heard. Someone on the floor has been raising the same tooling problem for months and this is their one chance a week to say it out loud, so naturally they take it, even if it isn’t really on the agenda. That’s not a discipline problem exactly, it’s more a sign that other channels for raising issues aren’t working, and the weekly meeting has ended up carrying weight it was never designed for. Worth keeping in mind, because tightening the meeting won’t fix that on its own. You may need a separate, quicker way for people to flag things day to day so the weekly session doesn’t have to absorb everything.

Add in the pressure most UK manufacturers are under right now, energy costs that remain among the highest of any developed economy, wage costs climbing faster than most would like, margins getting squeezed from every direction, and you can see why a meeting that eats an hour and produces nothing concrete is such an expensive habit. Time on the shop floor and in the office is tight. A meeting cadence that actually works isn’t a nice to have anymore. It’s one of the cheaper productivity levers you have, and it costs nothing except discipline.

The five step cadence that actually closes the loop

PDCA isn’t a new idea, and you don’t need me explaining it to you like you’ve never seen a fishbone diagram. But most teams only apply it to the physical process, the actual making of things, and never think to turn it inward on how they run meetings. That’s a shame, I think, because the same logic that stops a defect recurring on the line works just as well at stopping the same conversation recurring in the meeting room.

Here’s how it breaks down into five practical steps, each one mapping back to that plan, do, check, act rhythm.

Step one: start with the scoreboard, not the chat

Before anyone speaks, put the numbers up. Whatever your version of a scoreboard is, safety incidents, quality rejects, delivery performance, output against target, get it on the wall or the screen before the meeting even opens. This is the check part of the cycle, and it needs to happen first, not as an afterthought halfway through when someone remembers to mention it.

The point here isn’t to read the numbers aloud like a weather report. It’s to give everyone the same starting picture so the conversation is about what the data means, not what the data even is. Ask something simple. What moved since last week, and what didn’t?

Step two: ask why, not who

Once you know what happened, dig into the misses. Not every miss deserves deep analysis, to be fair, some things really are just a one off. But the recurring ones, the second and third time something’s gone wrong, deserve five minutes of proper root cause thinking rather than a shrug.

Try asking why something happened three times before you accept the first answer. The first answer is nearly always a symptom. “The machine jammed” isn’t a root cause. Why did it jam? What changed? Has it happened before? This is where you separate a genuine one off from a pattern that’s quietly costing you every single week.

Take something as ordinary as a late delivery. First answer is usually “the supplier was late.” Fair enough, but why? Maybe the order went in later than it should have. Why was that? Maybe nobody flagged the stock level until it was already tight. Why not? Maybe the reorder point on that part hasn’t been reviewed since demand picked up. Suddenly you’re not looking at a supplier problem anymore, you’re looking at a stock threshold that needs updating, and that’s an action you can actually fix this week rather than a supplier you can’t control.

Step three: pick one or two priorities, not ten

This is the plan part, and it’s where a lot of meetings quietly fall apart. There’s a temptation, especially when the scoreboard’s had a rough week, to try to fix everything at once. Don’t. Pick the one or two issues that matter most this week and commit to them properly. Everything else either waits its turn or gets handled outside the meeting entirely.

I’ve sat in on meetings where the team left with eleven actions and, unsurprisingly, completed about two of them. Compare that with a team that commits to two focused actions and actually finishes both. Which week made more real progress? It isn’t close, if I’m honest.

Step four: assign actions like you mean it

This is where the do part starts to take shape, even though the actual doing happens after the meeting ends. An action needs three things to survive the week. A single named owner, not a department or a team. A clear definition of what done looks like. And an actual date, not “soon” or “when I get a chance.”

Write it down somewhere everyone can see it, whether that’s a physical board by the meeting room or a shared spreadsheet everyone actually opens. If it only lives in someone’s notebook, it doesn’t really exist.

Step five: close the loop before you close the meeting

Before anyone leaves the room, read the actions back out loud. Every single one, owner and date included. It sounds almost too simple to matter, but this thirty second habit catches more misunderstandings than you’d expect. Someone will occasionally say “wait, I thought Dave was doing that one” right there in the room, which is a far better place to catch that mistake than a week later when nothing’s happened.

Then confirm the next meeting time. That’s what turns this into a cadence rather than a one off event. Next week’s check phase depends entirely on this week’s plan being clear enough to actually check against.

A sample agenda you can steal for Monday morning

You don’t need anything fancy for this. A thirty to forty minute slot, the same time and place every week, and a bit of discipline about actually sticking to it. Here’s a version you could run more or less as is.

  • Zero to five minutes: scoreboard review. Numbers go up before anyone talks. A quick read on what moved.
  • Five to fifteen minutes: last week’s actions. Go through each one. Done, not done, or in progress. For anything not done, ask why, briefly, and decide whether it carries forward or gets dropped for a good reason.
  • Fifteen to twenty five minutes: root cause the recurring issues. Pick the pattern that’s cost you the most this week and spend real time on why it keeps happening.
  • Twenty five to thirty five minutes: agree this week’s one or two priorities and assign them properly, owner, definition of done, date.
  • Thirty five to forty minutes: read the actions back, confirm everyone’s clear, and lock in next week’s meeting.

Notice what’s missing from that list. There’s no slot for general updates or a round the table where everyone shares what they’ve been up to lately. That’s on purpose. If people need to share updates that aren’t tied to an action or a metric, that’s what a quick message or a shorter, separate forum is for. This meeting has one job, which is closing the loop on what happened and opening a clear plan for what happens next.

Adjust the timings to suit your own team, obviously. A small tool room with four people might get through the whole thing in twenty minutes. A larger site with department heads from quality, production and logistics might genuinely need the full forty. What matters far more than the exact minutes is that every step happens, in order, every single week, without anyone skipping straight to problem solving before the scoreboard’s even gone up.

Getting actions to actually stick

Even with a decent cadence, actions still slip through the cracks if you’re not careful about how you write them. A few things worth getting right.

Write the action as an outcome, not a task. “Look into the packing line delay” is vague enough that almost anything counts as having done it. “Identify why pallets are queuing at the packing line and report back with one fix” gives you something you can actually check against next week.

One owner only. This one trips up more teams than you’d think, mostly because it feels a bit awkward to put someone on the spot in front of the group. But a shared action is nobody’s action. If a task genuinely needs two people, name a lead anyway. Someone has to be accountable for chasing it, even if others are helping along the way.

Keep actions small enough to finish in a week. If something’s clearly bigger than that, break it down. “Reduce scrap rate on line three” isn’t a week’s action, it’s a project. “Trial the revised setting on line three for two days and report the scrap rate” is.

Resist the urge to let actions roll over silently. If something didn’t get done, that’s information, not a failure to sweep under the rug. Maybe the priority genuinely shifted. Maybe the owner got pulled onto something urgent. Either way, say so out loud rather than letting it quietly vanish off the list. A meeting where actions can disappear without anyone noticing teaches everyone that deadlines are optional, and that lesson spreads fast, far faster than you’d like.

One more thing, and this comes from watching a fair few of these meetings over the years. The first few weeks will feel a bit stilted. People aren’t used to being asked “why” three times in a row, and they’re definitely not used to having their name next to a date on a board where everyone can see it. Stick with it anyway. I remember a small fabrication shop going from a Monday meeting that regularly ran past an hour with nothing much to show for it, to a twenty five minute session that actually cleared its action list most weeks. It took about six weeks of sticking to the format before people stopped treating it as a novelty and just started treating it as how things are done there.

Bringing it all together

None of this is complicated, and that’s rather the point. You don’t need new software, a consultant, or a training course to run a tighter weekly meeting. You need a scoreboard everyone looks at before they talk, a habit of asking why rather than who, a short list of priorities instead of a long wish list, actions with a name and a date attached to them, and thirty seconds at the end to read it all back.

Given what UK manufacturing is up against at the moment, tight margins, energy costs that show no sign of easing, a skills gap that means you genuinely can’t just throw more people at a problem, the time you waste in unproductive meetings is time you can’t really afford to lose. A tighter cadence is one of the few improvements that costs you nothing but the discipline to run it properly, and it tends to pay for itself within a month.

Give it five or six weeks before you judge it. The first meeting or two might feel a little awkward, and that’s fine, that’s normal, honestly. But once the habit sets in, you’ll notice the same conversation stops coming back week after week. Problems actually get closed instead of just discussed. And that Monday morning meeting stops being something people quietly dread and starts being the moment your week actually gets sorted out.

Start small if that feels safer. Pick just one team, one line, one meeting, and run the five steps properly for a month before you roll it out anywhere else. You’ll learn far more from getting it right in one room than from launching it everywhere at once and watching it fizzle out in three of the four. And if it does wobble in week two, which it might, that’s not proof it doesn’t work. That’s just the check phase doing exactly what it’s meant to do.

Want help making it stick

Reading about a better meeting cadence is one thing. Actually running it with a team that’s fallen into old habits, under real deadlines, with a hundred other things pulling at their attention, is another thing entirely. That’s exactly what our High Performing Teams Workshop was built for.

We work directly with your leadership team to build a cadence like the one above, tailored to your own scoreboard, your own priorities and your own people, so it survives well past that first slightly awkward week. You’ll leave with a cadence that’s already running on your shop floor, not just a good idea you meant to try someday.

If you’re ready to stop going in circles and start closing the loop for good, get in touch to find out more about the workshop and book your place.

How to Get Employees to Embrace Change: Overcoming Shop-Floor Resistance to Lean Methods

Posted on by Adam Payne

Introducing lean operational methods should make a business more efficient, more competitive, and more resilient. But if you work in manufacturing or engineering, you will know that the real challenge is rarely the process itself. It is getting people to accept it.

Too many change programmes fail because they are announced from the top, translated into jargon, and handed down to the shop floor as if buy-in can be demanded. It cannot. Employees embrace change when they understand why it is happening, when they feel involved in shaping it, and when they can see a clear benefit in their daily working lives.

That is especially true in technical businesses where experienced operators, machinists, welders, assembly teams, and supervisors already know what is broken in the process. They do not need to be told that improvement is necessary. They need to be convinced that this particular improvement will help, rather than simply make life harder.

This article looks at how to overcome shop-floor resistance to lean change in a way that is practical, credible, and commercially useful.

Why Shop-Floor Resistance Happens in Manufacturing

Resistance to change is often misunderstood. Leaders may see it as stubbornness, laziness, or a refusal to move with the times. In reality, it is usually a rational response to uncertainty.

On the shop floor, people are not reacting to a spreadsheet. They are reacting to the possibility that their workload will increase, their experience will be ignored, or their job security may be affected. When a new lean initiative is introduced, some employees hear, “We want you to do more with less.” Others hear, “We think the way you work now is wrong.” Neither interpretation helps build trust.

There is also the issue of history. Many manufacturing businesses have launched improvement initiatives that promised a lot and delivered very little. Employees remember those moments. If the last big programme ended with more paperwork, more meetings, and no real operational benefit, they will be sceptical the next time management announces something new.

That is why resistance should not be treated as a discipline problem. It is a message. It tells you that your people need more context, more reassurance, and more involvement before they will commit.

Why Lean Can Feel Threatening

Lean is one of the most misunderstood terms in manufacturing. Done well, it removes waste, improves flow, reduces frustration, and makes the business stronger. Done badly, it can feel like a polite label for cost-cutting.

That distinction matters. If your team believes lean is just a way of squeezing more output from fewer people, you will struggle to win support. If they believe it is about improving the way work gets done so that everyone has a better operation to work in, you have a chance.

For many employees, the word “lean” can trigger worry because it sounds abstract. Operators do not spend their day thinking about value streams or continuous improvement frameworks. They think about broken tooling, late materials, awkward changeovers, excessive walking, repeated rework, and the frustration of having to firefight avoidable problems. If a new initiative does not connect with those realities, it will feel detached from the world they actually work in.

The first task, then, is to make lean feel practical. Not theoretical. Not managerial. Practical.

Communicate the Change Early and Clearly

If you want employees to embrace change, you have to communicate before the rumour mill does it for you.

One of the biggest mistakes businesses make is waiting until everything is finalised before speaking to the workforce. By that stage, people have already filled the silence with assumptions. They may have overheard half a conversation, spotted a consultant on site, or sensed that something is being kept from them. Once that happens, trust begins to erode.

The best communication is early, honest, and repeated often. Say what the business is trying to achieve. Explain why the change is necessary. Be clear about what is changing, what is not changing, and what support people will receive along the way.

Avoid jargon wherever possible. Terms like “operational transformation”, “value-stream optimisation”, or “efficiency realignment” may sound impressive in a boardroom, but they do little to help a machine operator understand what is happening on the shop floor. Plain language works better. Tell people what problem you are trying to solve and why it matters.

It also helps to be honest about the difficult parts. If a change will take time to get used to, say so. If the business is facing competitive pressure, explain that too. People respect directness. They are much less forgiving of vague optimism.

Reframe Lean Around the Employee Experience

If lean is going to land well, it needs to be framed in terms of the employee experience, not just the business case.

That means answering the question every employee asks, whether aloud or not: “What is in it for me?”

For a production operator, the answer may be fewer interruptions, clearer instructions, better tooling locations, and less frustration caused by missing materials. For a supervisor, it may mean spending less time chasing problems and more time leading the team. For a maintenance engineer, it may mean fewer avoidable breakdowns caused by poor housekeeping or inconsistent standards.

This is where many change programmes fail. They talk about productivity, profitability, and competitiveness, but they never translate those ideas into daily working benefits. If you want people to buy into lean, make the connection visible.

Lean should be explained as a way to reduce waste, not people. It should be about making work smoother, safer, and more reliable. It should help staff do a better job with less frustration. Once employees see that, they are far more likely to engage.

Involve the Shop Floor Before You Implement

One of the most effective ways to reduce resistance is to involve employees early in the process.

Too many improvement efforts are designed in offices and then rolled out to the people expected to use them. That approach almost guarantees resistance. It sends the message that management already has the answer and only wants the workforce to comply.

A much better approach is to ask the people doing the work where the problems really are. They know where waste sits in the system. They know which tasks slow everything down. They know which shortcuts have become necessary because the original process no longer works properly.

That knowledge is invaluable.

Use workshops, Gemba walks, team discussions, and practical problem-solving sessions to gather their input. Ask them what frustrates them most, where time is lost, and which issues create the most stress. Then use that insight to shape the improvement plan.

When people help build the change, they are less likely to resist it. It becomes their solution, not a management imposition. That shift in ownership is one of the most powerful things you can create in a lean rollout.

Make Supervisors Your Change Champions

Supervisors and team leaders are often the most important people in a lean change programme. They are the link between senior management and the shop floor. If they do not believe in the change, the workforce will sense it immediately.

Employees do not just listen to what supervisors say. They watch what they do. A rolled eye, a dismissive comment, or a shrug of indifference can undermine weeks of careful communication. On the other hand, a calm and supportive supervisor can make a new process feel manageable and credible.

That is why supervisors need to be brought in early, briefed properly, and supported throughout the rollout. Do not just hand them a process document and expect them to carry the load. Give them time to ask questions, express concerns, and understand the logic behind the change.

It also helps to position them as coaches rather than enforcers. Their role is not simply to police compliance. It is to help people adapt, solve problems, and build confidence. If supervisors are left confused or unsupported, they cannot do that job well.

Consistent leadership matters too. If one shift follows the new standard and another quietly ignores it, the entire initiative begins to unravel. Alignment across shifts is essential if the change is going to stick.

Train People in a Practical, Hands-On Way

Training is often treated as a box-ticking exercise. That is a mistake.

If you want a new lean process to work, people need to understand it, practise it, and feel confident using it. That means training must be practical, specific, and tied to the actual workplace.

Long classroom sessions are rarely effective on their own. Most manufacturing employees learn best by doing, not by sitting through a slide deck. Demonstrations, visual prompts, side-by-side coaching, and repeated practice are much more effective than theory-heavy presentations.

The aim is not to overwhelm people with lean terminology. It is to make the new method feel achievable. If a process looks too complicated, too rushed, or too abstract, people will naturally fall back into old habits the moment pressure rises.

A good rule is to focus on competence before speed. Make sure people know what they are doing, why they are doing it, and how to do it safely and correctly. Once confidence builds, performance will follow.

Show Quick Wins Early

One of the most important lessons in change management is that people need to see results.

If a lean initiative takes six months to show any visible benefit, enthusiasm will fade. People need early evidence that the change is worthwhile. That is why quick wins matter so much.

Start with improvements that are visible, practical, and easy to appreciate. Reduce unnecessary walking. Improve a workstation layout. Introduce visual management to make materials easier to find. Cut a painful changeover time. Tidy a work area so it becomes easier and safer to use.

The improvement does not need to be dramatic. It just needs to be real.

When employees can see a better way of working and feel the difference in their own shift, scepticism starts to soften. Quick wins build credibility. They show that management is serious, that the process is working, and that the effort is leading somewhere useful.

They also help create momentum. Once one team sees a benefit, other teams become more open to trying the same thing.

Keep the Feedback Loop Open

Many businesses make the mistake of treating implementation as the finish line. They launch the new process, hold a meeting, perhaps make some celebratory noise, and then move on. But in reality, this is the point where the real work begins.

No process works perfectly on day one. There will always be friction, misunderstandings, and opportunities for refinement. If you do not create a feedback loop, problems will build quietly until people revert to the old way of doing things.

Regular feedback sessions help prevent that. Short daily reviews, improvement boards, team check-ins, and supervisor-led conversations all give people a chance to speak up. Just as importantly, they show that leadership is still listening.

This is where psychological safety matters. If employees believe they will be dismissed or criticised for raising issues, they will stop speaking. If they believe their feedback leads to genuine improvements, they will keep contributing.

Change should never feel like a one-off event. It should feel like an ongoing process of learning, refining, and improving together.

Common Mistakes That Increase Resistance

There are a few recurring mistakes that make it much harder to get employees to embrace change.

The first is launching without explanation. If people do not understand why the change is happening, they will invent their own explanation.

The second is using too much jargon. Manufacturing teams do not need management theatre. They need clarity.

The third is involving only senior managers and leaving frontline teams out of the conversation. That almost always produces resistance.

The fourth is trying to change too much at once. If every process is changing simultaneously, people can quickly feel overloaded.

The fifth is failing to follow through. If leadership says this change matters, but then disappears after launch, employees notice.

The final mistake is treating lean as a short-term project rather than a long-term culture shift. If the business wants continuous improvement, the commitment must be continuous too.

How to Build a Culture of Acceptance

If you want change to stick, you need to build more than compliance. You need to build trust.

That starts with the tone of the conversation. Employees are far more likely to support change when they feel respected, informed, and involved. It continues with visible leadership. People want to see that the people asking for change are also willing to listen, adapt, and support the rollout properly.

Over time, the goal is to shift the culture from “this is being done to us” to “we are doing this together.” That is when lean begins to work properly. Not because the tools are clever, but because the people using them believe in the purpose behind them.

For manufacturing and engineering businesses, that belief matters enormously. Technical change can only succeed when operational change is matched by human buy-in.

Final Thoughts

Employees do not embrace change because management says they should. They embrace change when they understand it, trust it, and can see the benefit in their own working lives.

If you want to overcome shop-floor resistance to lean methods, focus on the fundamentals. Communicate clearly. Involve people early. Support your supervisors. Train practically. Show quick wins. Keep listening. And make sure the change improves the work, rather than just renaming it.

Lean is most powerful when it is done with people, not to them.

Ready to Build Buy-In for Lean Change?

If your business is planning a lean rollout, but you want stronger shop-floor engagement and less resistance, we can help. At TCMUK Limited, we work with manufacturing, engineering, and technical businesses to turn operational improvement into real employee buy-in.

If you want to build a stronger culture of continuous improvement, get in touch to discuss how we can support your next stage of growth.

The Role of Innovation in Driving Growth for UK Manufacturers

Posted on by Adam Payne

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make up a significant portion of the manufacturing sector in the UK, and they play a crucial role in driving economic growth and job creation. However, with increasing competition and rapidly evolving technologies, it’s becoming more important than ever for SME manufacturers to innovate in order to stay competitive and achieve long-term growth.

Innovation can take many forms, from developing new products and processes to improving existing ones. By embracing innovation, SME manufacturers can unlock new markets, enhance their production capabilities, and create more value for their customers. Here are some key ways in which innovation can help drive growth in SME manufacturers with two approaches discussed in each section:

Product Innovation

Product innovation is a key way for SME manufacturers to differentiate themselves from competitors and capture new markets. This involves developing new products or improving existing ones in response to changing customer needs, market trends, or technological advancements. Product innovation can take many forms, such as improving product performance, adding new features, or developing new product lines.

One approach to product innovation is to engage with customers to understand their needs and pain points. This can involve conducting market research, surveys, or focus groups to identify gaps in the market and areas where innovation is needed. SMEs can also leverage social media and online platforms to gather customer feedback and insights.

Another approach is to invest in research and development (R&D) to develop new technologies or materials that can be used to create innovative products. This can involve collaborating with universities, research institutions, or other companies to access new knowledge and expertise. SMEs can also explore government funding and grants to support their R&D efforts.

Process Innovation

Process innovation involves improving manufacturing processes to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and improve quality. This can be achieved through the adoption of new technologies, automation of processes, or the streamlining of workflows. By implementing process innovation, SMEs can become more agile and responsive to market demands and achieve higher levels of productivity and profitability. (For further reading on process innovation or improvement – click here)

One approach to process innovation is to leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, or the internet of things (IoT) to automate processes and enhance decision-making. This can involve implementing smart sensors and devices that can collect and analyse data in real-time, enabling SMEs to optimise their processes and identify opportunities for improvement. (For further information about Digital Technologies check-out 7 Digital Technologies that will Transform Your Factory)

Another approach is to adopt lean manufacturing principles, which refers to eliminating waste from the production process. One way to do this is through continuous improvement programs like Six Sigma or Kaizen. These programs enable you to systematically identify areas for improvement and implement changes.

Business Model Innovation

Business model innovation involves developing new revenue streams or business models that can drive growth and increase profitability. This can involve exploring new markets, developing new distribution channels, or offering new value-added services.

One approach to business model innovation is to develop a subscription-based service that offers customers ongoing value and generates recurring revenue for SMEs. This can involve offering a service that complements existing products or developing a new product that is sold on a subscription basis.

Another approach is to explore online marketplaces or e-commerce platforms to reach new customers and expand the SME’s reach. SMEs can also leverage social media and other digital marketing channels to build brand awareness and generate leads.

Collaborative Innovation

Collaborative innovation involves partnering with other companies, universities, or research institutions to access new ideas, technologies, and resources. This can help SMEs develop breakthrough products or processes that would be difficult to achieve on their own.

One approach to collaborative innovation is to engage in open innovation, which involves collaborating with external partners and crowdsourcing ideas. This can involve setting up innovation challenges or hackathons to encourage the development of new ideas or products.

Another approach is to develop strategic partnerships with other companies or research institutions to access new knowledge or resources. This can involve forming joint ventures or licensing agreements to share expertise and resources.

Open Innovation

Open innovation involves collaborating with external partners and crowdsourcing ideas to accelerate innovation efforts. This can involve engaging with customers, suppliers, or other stakeholders to tap into a broader pool of knowledge and expertise.

One approach to open innovation is to engage in co-creation, which involves collaborating with customers to develop new products or services. This can involve setting up user communities or customer advisory boards to gather feedback and insights.

Another approach is to leverage open innovation platforms or networks to access a wider pool of ideas and resources. SMEs can also participate in industry events or conferences to network with other professionals and share best practices for innovation.

In order to successfully implement open innovation, SMEs should create a culture that values and encourages innovation. This can involve setting up an innovation team or department, providing training and resources for employees to develop their innovation skills, and incentivising and rewarding innovation efforts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, innovation is a critical driver of growth for SME manufacturing businesses in the UK. By adopting an innovation mindset, SMEs can stay ahead of the competition, create more value for their customers, and achieve long-term success. Whether through product innovation, process innovation, business model innovation, collaborative innovation, or open innovation, SMEs have many options to explore and unlock their full potential.

The 7 Wastes: Unseen Thieves in Your Business

Posted on by Adam Payne

In the world of lean manufacturing, ‘The 7 Wastes’ are infamous for their stealthy operations, silently chipping away at profits and productivity. These wastes fly under the radar, often going unnoticed by even the most astute professionals. Yet, if left unchecked, they can cripple an organisation’s ability to remain competitive and responsive to customer demands.

The Infamous Seven: TIMWOOD

Meet the hidden culprits named TIMWOOD, an acronym that represents the seven wastes in manufacturing:

7 Wastes Infographic

Transport (Unnecessary Movement of Materials)

The unnecessary movement of materials from one place to another is often the result of poor shop layout or a disjointed process flow. This waste can lead to an increase in handling which may cause damage or loss of materials, delays, and added labour costs. Eliminating this waste requires a streamlined approach to layout design and process flow optimisation.

Inventory (Excess Products and Materials)

Excess inventory is a common issue where production outpaces demand, leading to tied-up capital, storage costs, potential obsolescence, and increased risk of damage or loss. Inventory levels should be scrutinised, and techniques such as Just-in-Time (JIT) production and demand-driven planning should be considered for improvement.

Motion (Unnecessary Movement by People)

Similar to Transport, Motion refers to any movement by employees that does not add value to the product. This can range from reaching for tools to walking between workstations. Reducing unnecessary motion is integral to improving ergonomic conditions and efficiency. This reduction can be achieved by redesigning workspaces to minimise reach and travel distance and by standardising work procedures.

Waiting (Idle Time)

When employees or machines are idly waiting for the next step in production, this represents a significant waste of time and resources. This can be due to poor workflow, machine breakdowns, or bottlenecks. Tackling this waste involves a thorough analysis of processes to synchronise work steps and to ensure a continuous flow.

Overproduction (Producing More Than Needed)

Manufacturing items before they are actually required or in quantities exceeding customer demand results in overproduction – the root of many other wastes. This can lead to excessive inventory and increased holding costs. To nip overproduction in the bud, implement pull systems based on real customer demand.

Over-Processing (More Work Than Required)

Over-processing is seen when more work is done on a product than what is valued by the customer. This waste occurs due to unclear customer specifications or internal miscommunication. Reducing over-processing demands a clear understanding of what the customer values and aligning the production process to those standards.

Defects (Production that Requires Rework)

Defects and the need for rework can be the most apparent and costly form of waste. They lead to wasted materials, labour, and time, not to mention the potential to harm a business’s reputation. A culture focused on quality—like adopting Six Sigma or Total Quality Management (TQM)—can significantly curtail the occurrence of defects.

Identification and Elimination Strategy

Recognising ‘The 7 Wastes’ is the first step to effective lean management. It’s essential to develop a keen eye for these wastes and instil this perspective across all levels of the organisation. This is not a “once in a blue moon” activity but a regular practice that should be embedded into the daily routine. Regular audits, employee training, and a culture that promotes continuous improvement are key factors for success.

To embed this practice, create a system of visible metrics and feedback loops. This promotes responsibility and awareness amongst teams. Engage employees in problem-solving and encourage them to take ownership of their workspaces, suggest changes, and implement improvements.

7 Wastes within a process

Continuous Improvement: The Lean Way

To enter into a sustainable cycle of continuous improvement, adopt the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology. Regularly plan improvements, do them in controlled conditions, check the outcomes, and act to standardise and stabilise the improvements.

Key Takeaways

Employing strategies to eliminate the wastes identified by TIMWOOD ensures a company’s ability to thrive in today’s competitive marketplace. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement, providing employee education, and implementing systems that promote efficiency, companies can not only identify waste but turn it into opportunity – for growth, for innovation, and for delivering value to customers that rivals cannot match.

If you need help applying these principles and taking practical steps towards eliminating waste, our team at TCMUK Limited is equipped to guide you through the process. The impact of addressing ‘The 7 Wastes’ can be profound. Call us at 0330 311 2820 or email info@tcmuklimited.co.uk to unlock the full potential of lean in your operation.

Sharing insightful methodologies for operational excellence is at the core of what we do. If you found this article useful, please share it with your networks. We encourage feedback and welcome any questions. Feel free to connect on LinkedIn or reach out to continue the conversation on optimising your business processes.

 0330 311 2820

Reindustrialising Britain.

Posted on by Adam Payne

Just reading though an article (again) in the UK Manufacturing Review and felt compelled to quote James Selka (CEO of The Manufacturing Technologies Association).

I have to say James is spot on with his comments.

“We are living through an explosion in the potential of technology, and it provides a most wonderful opportunity to reinvigorate the manufacturing sector in the 21st century.”

“Manufacturing is remarkable because of the multiplier effect that the sector has. It is so complex, and touches so many other sectors, that activity in it acts as a stimulus to the economy as a whole.”

“As technology becomes more central to the process of manufacturing, the cost of labour – the rationale for much of the offshoring that took place – is a smaller and smaller proportion of the cost of manufacturing activity. Labour cost becomes less of a driver…”

“This is not just about what others can do for us, but what we – UK Manufacturing – can do to help ourselves”

Extracts taken from the UK Manufacturing Review 2015 -16 (Stirling Media).

0330 311 2820

Book a Return Call at a time that Best Suits You “HERE”